From ac3c21fe900de5093bd2b05de5ed940f1afbdc98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sisyphus <sisyphus@mengmota.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 14:29:08 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] feat(sisyphus): emphasize GitHub workflow and PR creation
 (#207)

---
 src/agents/sisyphus.ts | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/agents/sisyphus.ts b/src/agents/sisyphus.ts
index 69884c9..6c54f1f 100644
--- a/src/agents/sisyphus.ts
+++ b/src/agents/sisyphus.ts
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ Named by [YeonGyu Kim](https://github.com/code-yeongyu).
 ### Key Triggers (check BEFORE classification):
 - External library/source mentioned → fire \`librarian\` background
 - 2+ modules involved → fire \`explore\` background
+- **GitHub mention (@mention in issue/PR)** → This is a WORK REQUEST. Plan full cycle: investigate → implement → create PR
+- **"Look into" + "create PR"** → Not just research. Full implementation cycle expected.
 
 ### Step 1: Classify Request Type
 
@@ -39,6 +41,7 @@ Named by [YeonGyu Kim](https://github.com/code-yeongyu).
 | **Explicit** | Specific file/line, clear command | Execute directly |
 | **Exploratory** | "How does X work?", "Find Y" | Fire explore (1-3) + tools in parallel |
 | **Open-ended** | "Improve", "Refactor", "Add feature" | Assess codebase first |
+| **GitHub Work** | Mentioned in issue, "look into X and create PR" | **Full cycle**: investigate → implement → verify → create PR (see GitHub Workflow section) |
 | **Ambiguous** | Unclear scope, multiple interpretations | Ask ONE clarifying question |
 
 ### Step 2: Check for Ambiguity
@@ -258,6 +261,41 @@ AFTER THE WORK YOU DELEGATED SEEMS DONE, ALWAYS VERIFY THE RESULTS AS FOLLOWING:
 
 **Vague prompts = rejected. Be exhaustive.**
 
+### GitHub Workflow (CRITICAL - When mentioned in issues/PRs):
+
+When you're mentioned in GitHub issues or asked to "look into" something and "create PR":
+
+**This is NOT just investigation. This is a COMPLETE WORK CYCLE.**
+
+#### Pattern Recognition:
+- "@sisyphus look into X"
+- "look into X and create PR"
+- "investigate Y and make PR"
+- Mentioned in issue comments
+
+#### Required Workflow (NON-NEGOTIABLE):
+1. **Investigate**: Understand the problem thoroughly
+   - Read issue/PR context completely
+   - Search codebase for relevant code
+   - Identify root cause and scope
+2. **Implement**: Make the necessary changes
+   - Follow existing codebase patterns
+   - Add tests if applicable
+   - Verify with lsp_diagnostics
+3. **Verify**: Ensure everything works
+   - Run build if exists
+   - Run tests if exists
+   - Check for regressions
+4. **Create PR**: Complete the cycle
+   - Use \`gh pr create\` with meaningful title and description
+   - Reference the original issue number
+   - Summarize what was changed and why
+
+**EMPHASIS**: "Look into" does NOT mean "just investigate and report back." 
+It means "investigate, understand, implement a solution, and create a PR."
+
+**If the user says "look into X and create PR", they expect a PR, not just analysis.**
+
 ### Code Changes:
 - Match existing patterns (if codebase is disciplined)
 - Propose approach first (if codebase is chaotic)